Drawing for Serial No. 79041208

USPTO serial 79041208

Serial No. 79041208

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3572743Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 10, 2009
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79041208?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Phouphanomketh Ditthavong

Phouphanomketh Ditthavong Ditthavong & Steiner, P.C.44 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 322Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Cleaning tools and washing utensils, namely, floor polish applicators mounted on mop handles, blades for cleaning solution applicators, namely, blades for use with floor polish applicators, scrubbing brushes, cleaning sponges, cleaning cloths, buckets, bases for placing the buckets thereon, dispensers for cleaning and disinfection solutions, mops and structural parts therefor, namely, mop bases, mop handles, pole joints for mops, swivel joints for mops, handle joins for mops, squeegees and structural parts therefor, namely, poles for squeegees bodies, squeegee channels, squeegee blades, and fittings to attach blades to squeegeesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 30, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 10, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 13, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 8, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 5, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 10, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 10, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 29, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 17, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 17, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 17, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 16, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 17, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 14, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 11, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 11, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance