USPTO serial 79041463
SÈVRES 1740
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SÈVRES 1740?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Porcelain (earthenware, sandstone) namely biscuits (unglazed porcelain), table services, vases, decorative panels, statues and statuettes of porcelain | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 13, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 15, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 22, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |