Drawing for S901

USPTO serial 79041502

S901

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3554298Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 30, 2008
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with S901?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary M. Nath

Gary M. Nath The Nath Law Group112 S. West StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture; mobile furniture, namely, desks, chairs and cabinets, all mounted on wheels; conference furniture; conference tables; office furniture; office tables; office desks; office seating, namely, office chairs; wall cabinets; card index cabinets; sideboards; furniture parts, namely, containers, namely, non-metal containers with and without castors for commercial use; stranding desks; furniture parts of the aforementioned goods; mirrorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 1, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 17, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 3, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Mar 31, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 8, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 30, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 14, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 20, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 21, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 22, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance