USPTO serial 79041504
ANTEPRIMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANTEPRIMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLPOne Chase RoadLackenbach Siegel BuildingScarsdale, NY 10583Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers; parts and accessories for computers, namely, data processors, motherboards, video display cards, sound cards, keyboards, mice, memories, scanners, printers, blank CD-ROMs, pre-recorded CD-ROMs featuring music, sound, video, videogames, software, CD-ROM drives, CD-ROM writers, mastering devices in the nature of hardware and software for editing images, computer monitors; televisions; satellite receivers; digital video recorders; video tape and cassette recorders; audio apparatus, namely, digital audio recorders, digital audio players, audio tape and cassette recorders, audio tape and cassette players, audio speakers, and audio receivers; video apparatus, namely, digital video recorders, digital video players, video tape and cassette recorders, video tape and cassette players, video cameras, and video monitors; car radios; blank video cassettes and audio cassettes; pre-recorded video cassettes and audio cassettes featuring music, sound, video, videogames, software; camcorders; modems; data transfer devices with and without wire, namely, modems and wireless access point devices; audio speakers and transceivers; memory cards; sound diffusion system in the nature of multiple audio speakers sold as a unit | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |