Drawing for KINGORIGIN

USPTO serial 79041520

KINGORIGIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KINGORIGIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Brushes, brush goods , namely, powder brushes, blusher brushes, eye shadow brushes, eye liner brushes, mascara brushes; eye brow brush, lip brush, hair brushes, shaving brushes, nail brushes, toilet brushes, bath brushes, clothes brushes, dishwashing brushes, brushes for cleaning tanks and containers, lamp glass brushes, scrubbing brushes, toothbrushes, shoe brushes, tub brushes, pot cleaning brushesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 30, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 11, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance