USPTO serial 79041530
TURBOHELICAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 6, 2009
- Examiner
- TOOLEY, DAVID E
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TURBOHELICAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
KABUSHIKI KAISHA MIYANAGA; (doing business as MIYANAGA CO., LTD.)
Miki-shi; Hyogo, JP
Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA MIYANAGA; (doing business as MIYANAGA CO., LTD.)
KABUSHIKI KAISHA MIYANAGA; (doing business as MIYANAGA CO., LTD.)
JP
Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA MIYANAGA; (doing business as MIYANAGA CO., LTD.)
KABUSHIKI KAISHA MIYANAGA; (doing business as MIYANAGA CO., LTD.)
JP
Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA MIYANAGA; (doing business as MIYANAGA CO., LTD.)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Alleman
Mark D. Alleman ALLEMAN HALL CREASMAN & TUTTLE LLP900 SW 5th AvenueSuite 2300Portland, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Tips for cemented carbide cutting tools; metal working machines and tools, namely, punching presses, power-operated saws, grinding machines, milling cutters, lathes, milling machines, metal boring machines, drilling machines, pneumatic drills, pneumatic hammers, hand-held power operated drills, hand-held power operated hammers, hand-held power operated screwdrivers, cemented carbide cutting tools, and diamond-pointed metal-cutting tools; lumbering, woodworking, or veneer or plywood making machines and apparatus, namely, power-operated saws, lathes, milling machines, drilling machines, and milling cutters; ] stone working machines and tools, namely, power operated drills, power operated hammers, [ power operated stone cutters and power operated stone grinders; ] parts and accessories for aforesaid goods, namely, [ power saw blades, power hole saw blades, ] power drill bits, [ chucks for power drills, drills heads for power drills, ] hammer bits for power operated hammers [, and shanks for cutting machines ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA MIYANAGA; (doing business as MIYANAGA CO., LTD.)
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA MIYANAGA; (doing business as MIYANAGA CO., LTD.)
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA MIYANAGA; (doing business as MIYANAGA CO., LTD.)
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named TURBOHELICAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 4, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |