Drawing for ERANGE

USPTO serial 79041564

ERANGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 401
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ERANGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark B. Harrison

MARK B. HARRISION VENABLE LPP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20045 9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
013WEAPONS, NAMELY, GAS BOMBS; AIR PISTOL BULLETS; MACHINE GUN BULLETS; MACHINE GUN CARTRIDGES; LEAD SHOT SHELLS FOR HUNTING; SHOTGUN CARTRIDGES; INCENDIARY CARTRIDGES; RIFLE CARTRIDGES; HUNTING GUN CARTRIDGES; PYROTECHNICS; BULLETS; AMMUNITION; CARTRIDGES POUCHES; BODIES OF SHELL; EXPLOSIVE SHELLS; BOMBS; AMMUNITION FOR FIREARMSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2009DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 16, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 16, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 16, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 2, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 24, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 24, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance