Drawing for CARTER

USPTO serial 79041598

CARTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Excavating machines; diggers, namely, earth moving machines, namely, excavators; loading machines; road making machines, namely, concrete paving machines, asphalt paving machines; multi-use road maintainers, namely, road sweepers; road packers, namely, road rollers; ramming machines, namely, rams for road making; beating machines, namely, wood beating machines; hoists; capstans, namely, winches; trench diggers, namely, trench cutters; shovel transporters, namely, conveyors with shovels, pneumatic transporters; earth moving machines, namely, scrapers; industrial machine pressesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 15, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 30, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 6, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 6, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 6, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 6, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 6, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 18, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 27, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 26, 2008OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2008OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Mar 26, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 11, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance