Drawing for SHOCKLATE

USPTO serial 79041614

SHOCKLATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3612540Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 28, 2009
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHOCKLATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Meyer A. Gross

MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP292 MADISON AVE FL 19NEW YORK, NY 10017-6313UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, fish, poultry, game, jam, eggs, milk; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurtSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Sugar, rice, bread, popcorn, honey, baking-powderSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
032Mineral and aerated waters; non-alcoholic drinks, namely, energy drinks, carbonated beverages and soft drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; preparations for making beverages, namely, concentratesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jan 11, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 11, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 14, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 4, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 4, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 4, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 4, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 13, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 29, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 5, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 31, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 30, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 30, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 26, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance