Drawing for MISSION ENERGY

USPTO serial 79041634

MISSION ENERGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3431566Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 20, 2008
Examiner
MAI, TINA HSIN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MISSION ENERGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard J. Shire

Howard J. Shire Kenyon & Kenyon LLPOne BroadwayNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011High-precision air conditioning apparatus; water chillers; energy-saving systems for conditioning cabinets, namely, air conditioning unitsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 5, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 21, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 21, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 6, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 17, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
May 17, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 17, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 12, 201471AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
May 12, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 10, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 21, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 31, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 31, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 17, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 3, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance