Drawing for MIEDEMA

USPTO serial 79041678

MIEDEMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIEDEMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines not included in other classes and machine tools; motors and engines; couplings and belts (other than for land vehicles); agricultural implements; conveyors and belts thereforACTIVE—
012Goods handling cartsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 18, 2022CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 2, 2022GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 20, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2008DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 3, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 3, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 28, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 6, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 6, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2007SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance