USPTO serial 79041693
PERIOTYPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERIOTYPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus
Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical implants comprising of artificial material; orthodontic implants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |