Drawing for Serial No. 79041695

USPTO serial 79041695

Serial No. 79041695

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79041695?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Fluorescent lampsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 23, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 20, 2016CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 5, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jul 31, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 21, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 29, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 14, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 26, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 22, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 25, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 10, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 10, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance