Drawing for CANARD-DUCHENE CUVEE LEONIE

USPTO serial 79041719

CANARD-DUCHENE CUVEE LEONIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3631484Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 2, 2009
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANARD-DUCHENE CUVEE LEONIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Lawrence E. Abelman ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 Third Avenue 10th FloorNew York, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines of French origin, namely, champagneSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 25, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 25, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 2, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 2, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 26, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 12, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 5, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 22, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 1, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 1, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance