Drawing for HYUNDAI LOGISTICS CO., LTD.

USPTO serial 79041738

HYUNDAI LOGISTICS CO., LTD.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3793172Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 25, 2010
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYUNDAI LOGISTICS CO., LTD.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Corey A. Donaldson

COREY A. DONALDSON KOPPEL PATRICK HEYBL & PHILPOTT2815 TOWNSGATE ROAD, SUITE 215WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Car transport; railway transport; administration of harbor facilities, namely, providing rental of storage containers at harbor facilities, providing harbor crane unloading of baggage, luggage and freight, providing cargo unloading at harbor facilities featuring the unloading of baggage, luggage and freight, providing passenger check-in services at harbor transportation facilities; marine transportation agency, namely, providing marine transport; air transport agency, namely, providing air transport; transport of goods, namely, transport of household stuffs; freight transport agency, namely, global transportation of freight for others by all available means; International complex transportation, namely, transportation by air, rail, ship and truck; document delivery, namely, transportation of document packages; courier services for messages and merchandise; general warehousing services; storage of merchandise, namely, warehouse storage; goods warehousing, namely, warehousing of farm products, marine products, livestock products, dangerous goods, and high-priced products; refrigerated warehousing services; rental of warehouses; storage of baggageSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 2, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 2, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 15, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 7, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 25, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 9, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 27, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 28, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 28, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 15, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 3, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 2, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 2, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance