Drawing for STOR CÉZON

USPTO serial 79041756

STOR CÉZON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STOR CÉZON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, shirts; trousers; dust coats; overcoats; shoes; hats; neckties; belts; leather clothes, namely, leather pants, leather jackets, leather coats, leather skirtsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 23, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 12, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 15, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2009PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Feb 26, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2009PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 12, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 23, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 14, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 3, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 31, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 31, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance