Drawing for ARARE

USPTO serial 79041778

ARARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3576335Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 17, 2009
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer D. Arkowitz

Jennifer D. Arkowitz Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP2 Embarcadero Center 8th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Preserved, dried and cooked or prepared fruit and vegetables; croquettes; grilled, dried, prepared and seasoned walnuts; raisinsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Corn chips; snacks, namely, rice-based snack foods, granola snacks, products for snacks made with cereals and/or rice, namely, cereal derived food bars, cookies, crackers; corn flour, potato flour, flour and confectionery preparations based on cereals or made with cereals, namely, cereal derived food bars, cookies, crackers; popcorn; rice and rice preparations, namely, rice-based snack foods, granola snacksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 3, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 24, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 24, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 18, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 18, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 26, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 26, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 17, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 12, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 27, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 8, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 8, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 8, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 2, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 2, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 14, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 13, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance