USPTO serial 79041783
DUCT RUNNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3492859Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2008
- Examiner
- JORDAN, AMEETA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with DUCT RUNNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin W. Schiffmiller
Martin W. Schiffmiller Kirschstein Israel Schiffmiller & Pieroni, P.C.425 Fifth Avenue, Fifth Floor, Suite 501NEW YORK, NY 10016-2223UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PROBES FOR SCIENTIFIC USE, PROBING DEVICES, APPARATUS AND INSTALLATIONS USED FOR THE GENERATION OF MAPS OF EXISTING AND NEW UNDERGROUND AND SURFACE INFRASTRUCTURES AND NETWORKS OF PIPES, CABLES, PIPELINES, NAMELY, GYROSCOPE BASED INERTIAL MEASUREMENT PROBE DESIGNED TO MAP UTILITY NETWORKS FOR PIPELINE MAPPING SYSTEM, HYDRO RUNNER SYSTEM, CONDUITS RUNNER SYSTEM AND TRAJECTORIES RUNNER SYSTEM ADAPTED FOR A WIDE RANGE OF PIPE AND CONDUIT DIAMETERS, PASSING BENDS AND OBSTACLES AND OPERATING IN A VARIETY OF PIPE AND CONDUIT MATERIALS AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF AGING; GYROSCOPE BASED INERTIAL MEASUREMENT PROBE AND WHEELS SOLD AS A UNIT, DESIGNED TO MAP UTILITY NETWORKS FOR PIPELINE MAPPING SYSTEM, HYDRO RUNNER SYSTEM, CONDUITS RUNNER SYSTEM AND TRAJECTORIES RUNNER SYSTEM ADAPTED FOR A WIDE RANGE OF PIPE AND CONDUIT DIAMETERS, PASSING BENDS AND OBSTACLES AND OPERATING IN A VARIETY OF PIPE AND CONDUIT MATERIALS AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF AGING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by REDUCT, naamloze vennootschap
- Other trademarks owned by REDUCT, naamloze vennootschap
- Other trademarks owned by REDUCT, naamloze vennootschap
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DUCT RUNNER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 7, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |