Drawing for BEMER

USPTO serial 79041801

BEMER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GENOVESE, CARRIE A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEMER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003CosmeticsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
010Medical apparatusSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 11, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 6, 2017CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Sep 29, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 13, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 12, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 23, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 29, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 29, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 29, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 19, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 1, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 30, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance