Drawing for I-TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 79041842

I-TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3496169Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 2, 2008
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I-TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KAY LYN SCHWARTZ

KAY LYN SCHWARTZ GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP1601 ELM STREET, SUITE 3000IP SECTIONDALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Ophthalmic lenses; spectacle lenses, namely, plastic lenses, mineral lenses, corrective lenses, progressive lenses, sunglass lenses, polarized lenses, tinted lenses, light-sensitive lenses, photochromic lenses, treated lenses, coated lenses, anti-reflective lenses, semi-finished lenses; spectacle lens blanks; semi-finished spectacle lens blanks; contact lenses; cases for all the aforesaid goodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 22, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 21, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 19, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 3, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 3, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 13, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 2, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 17, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 31, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 27, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2007RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Sep 22, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance