Drawing for SAFRANISSIM'OH! HARMONY COLOR COMPLEX EUGENE PERMA

USPTO serial 79041849

SAFRANISSIM'OH! HARMONY COLOR COMPLEX EUGENE PERMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3547020Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 16, 2008
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAFRANISSIM'OH! HARMONY COLOR COMPLEX EUGENE PERMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurel V. Dineff

Laurel V. Dineff DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 North Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair lotions; hair creams; hair gels; hair sprays; hair mousses; hair-styling products, namely, styling wax, styling gels, styling lotions, styling hair creams, styling hair foam, styling mousse, styling clay, styling hair mask, styling paste, styling balsam, emollients, lacquers, hair pomades, sculpting gel, cosmetic hair balms; hair curling products, namely, hair lotions, hair sprays, hair mousses, styling hair foams; shampoos; brilliantines; hair fixers; hair colorants; perming products and their neutralizers, namely, permanent wave preparations and their neutralizers; hair straightening preparations and their neutralizers; products for hair and scalp hygiene not for medical use, namely, conditioners; hair bleaching and hair lightening preparations; hair coloring preparationsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 5, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 24, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 28, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Mar 17, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 17, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 21, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 16, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 30, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2008CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2008GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2008GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2008CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
May 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 6, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 6, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 26, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 28, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 28, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance