Drawing for S SANTONI

USPTO serial 79041896

S SANTONI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3476903Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 29, 2008
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with S SANTONI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jamie E. Sternberg

Jamie E. Sternberg Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Dyeing machines; hot air drying machines for textiles; ] knitting machines; [ portable rotary steam presses for fabrics; spinning machines for thread and textiles; yarn warping machines; printing machines for textiles; embroidery machines; hosiery looms; lace making machines; ] hosiery knitting machines and parts thereof; [ spinning wheels and frames for textile weaving machines; power weaving looms; sizing machines for textiles; pressing machines to make satin-like finish on textiles; carding machines; wire drawing machines; reels for weaving looms; bobbins for weaving looms; slides for knitting machines; carriages for knitting machines; thread twisting machines; threading machines; loom shafts; looms being machines; tambours for embroidery machines; ] industrial sewing machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 20, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 20, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 12, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 5, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 5, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 16, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 17, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Feb 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 19, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 13, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 15, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance