Drawing for SI

USPTO serial 79041900

SI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3939880Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 5, 2011
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KLAUS P. STOFFEL

KLAUS P. STOFFEL LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP30 BROAD STREET21ST FLOORNew York, NY 10004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic instruments, namely, electronic punching and timing systems for outdoor sports, comprising: electronic portable data collectors having data exchange capability with electronic cards, electronic cards including memory chips, software; holders for electronic cards; and computerized time clocks; all of the foregoing goods used for outdoor sportsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 19, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 19, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 12, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 12, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 12, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 2, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 29, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 5, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 2, 2011TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Mar 2, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 2, 2011OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 4, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2010RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2010OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 19, 2010OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2010OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Feb 16, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 30, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 14, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 11, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 11, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 11, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 11, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 23, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 22, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 21, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance