Drawing for TRINOVO

USPTO serial 79041950

TRINOVO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3583499Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 3, 2009
Examiner
KEAN, AMY C
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with TRINOVO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William B. Slate

William B. Slate Bachman & LaPointe, P.C.900 Chapel StreetSuite 1201New Haven, CT 06405

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical and dental instruments, namely, mallets, tensioning pliers, [ bone traps, synthetic filler material to serve as a replacement for bone, ] bone holding pliers, bone mills, bone scrapers, [ bone carriers, namely, injection syringes used for the placement of synthetic bone replacement materials, ] bone compactors, chisels, calipers, sinus lift procedure instruments, scalers, curettes, probes, periodontal probes, gingivectomy knives, periodontal files, periosteal elevators, periodontal chisels, gingival margin trimmers, crown holders, spreaders, tweezers, bone rongeurs, needle holders, suture pliers, scissors, [ wire bending pliers, wire cutting pliers, ] periotomes, retractors, tongue depressors, root elevators, sharp spoons and forcepsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2025CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 6, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 11, 2020XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2020XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 22, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 22, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 11, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 28, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 31, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 19, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 11, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 3, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 3, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 19, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 4, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 2, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 21, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance