Drawing for CILAS ECOSIZER

USPTO serial 79042029

CILAS ECOSIZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3576340Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 17, 2009
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CILAS ECOSIZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicole M. Meyer

NICOLE M. MEYER DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC1825 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for laser particle analysis, namely, lasers for measuring purposes; laser granulometers; computer software for laser particle analysisSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Arranging and conducting of educational colloquiums, conferences, conventions and seminars, symposiums regarding laser particle analysis; publication of books and reviews concerning laser particle analysisSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Technical research for laser particle analysis; engineering for laser particle analysis; design for others in the field of apparatus for laser particle analysis; expertise activities in the field of apparatus for laser particle analysis, namely, drawing up of expert technical opinions in the field of optical instruments and apparatus for others, providing expert consultation in the field of laser particle analysis; development, design, installation, updating and maintenance of computer software for laser particle analysis; computer programming for laser particle analysis; development of software in connection with laser particle analysisSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 14, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 24, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 18, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 6, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 20, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 26, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 26, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 17, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 2, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 17, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 20, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance