USPTO serial 79042031
CORDIALS V.I.P. DRINKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3651220Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 7, 2009
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CORDIALS V.I.P. DRINKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
US
Wien, AT
Wien, AT
Wien, AT
Cape Coral, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, colas, non-alcoholic cocktails, lemonades, fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks, fruit juices and fruit beverages, namely, fruit sodas | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, except beers, namely, liqueurs, rum, brandy, vodka, gin, and tequila | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Services for providing food and drink; temporary accommodation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UNC Holding LLC
- Other trademarks owned by V.I.P. Drinks GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by V.I.P. Drinks GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by V.I.P. Drinks GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Mabel Rusch
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named CORDIALS V.I.P. DRINKS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2021 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2020 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2019 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 22, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |