Drawing for 3D-WEAR S SANTONI

USPTO serial 79042042

3D-WEAR S SANTONI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3505495Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 23, 2008
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 3D-WEAR S SANTONI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Dyeing machines; hot air drying machines for textiles; knitting machines; portable rotary steam presses for fabrics; spinning machines for thread and textiles; yarn warping machines; printing machines for textiles; embroidery machines; hosiery looms; lace making machines; hosiery knitting machines and parts thereof; spinning wheels and frames for textile weaving machines; power weaving looms; sizing machines for textiles; pressing machines to make satin-like finish on textiles; carding machines; wire drawing machines; reels for weaving looms; bobbins for weaving looms; slides for knitting machines; carriages for knitting machines; thread twisting machines; threading machines; loom shafts; looms being machines; tambours for embroidery machines; industrial sewing machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 22, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 24, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 27, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 24, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 24, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 30, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Feb 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 23, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 30, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 22, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 22, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 22, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 22, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 21, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 28, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 28, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance