Drawing for CERAMIC POWER LIQUID

USPTO serial 79042067

CERAMIC POWER LIQUID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CERAMIC POWER LIQUID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Lubricants for motor vehicle enginesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 22, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 16, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 19, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 9, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 12, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 1, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 29, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance