Drawing for AIRSYS

USPTO serial 79042129

AIRSYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3708760Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 10, 2009
Examiner
ROSSMAN, MARY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with AIRSYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yue (Robert) Xu

Yue (Robert) Xu Apex Attorneys at Law, LLP160 Alamo Plaza #942Alamo, CA 94507UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Cooling installations for water, namely, water cooling towers, component parts for water cooling towers in the nature of wire mesh hangers for securing slat fill; refrigeration apparatus and machines, namely, portable refrigerated rooms, refrigerated trailers, refrigeration equipment, namely, rapid food chilling units; refrigerating appliances and installations, namely, refrigerators, refrigerator shelving, drawers, bins and trays; refrigeration equipment, namely, food and beverage chilling units; cooling appliances and installations, namely, cooling domes, cooling evaporators, evaporative air coolers; air conditioning installations, namely, central air-conditioning installations for industrial purposes, air-conditioning apparatus for industrial purposes; air conditioning devices, namely, air conditioners, air conditioning units; air cooling apparatus, namely, evaporative air coolers for air conditioning and cooling systems; gas scrubbing apparatus, namely, electro-chemical flue gas scrubbing machines; ventilation installations, namely, ventilating fans for commercial and industrial use; apparatus for air-conditioning, namely, air conditioning panels for use in walk in evaporative coolers, valves for air conditionersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 1, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 20, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 26, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 22, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 17, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 7, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 10, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 10, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 25, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 17, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 10, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 10, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 18, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 19, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 10, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 10, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 26, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 3, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 3, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance