USPTO serial 79042158
MIX'N'BALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3496174Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 2, 2008
- Examiner
- DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIX'N'BALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Alumit,
JOHN ALUMIT, PATEL & ALUMIT, PC16830 VENTURA BLVDSUITE 360ENCINO, CA 91436Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Presses and grinding machines and installations, namely, grinding mills, electric food grinders for commercial or domestic use and electric food choppers; kitchen machines, namely, grinding mills, mixers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | Hand tools and hand operated implements, namely, manually-operated grinding wheels and mandolines; cutlery; table forks and spoons; side arms, not including firearms, namely, hunting knives and swords | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |