USPTO serial 79042208
VTRACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3761364Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 16, 2010
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JULIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VTRACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
NL-5621 BA Eindhoven, NL
Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
NL-5621 BA Eindhoven, NL
Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
NL-5621 BA Eindhoven, NL
Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward W. Goodman, Robert J. Kraus, David L. Barnes, Michael E. Marion, Jack E. Haken
Edward W. Goodman PHILIPS IP&SP.O. Box 3001Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510-8001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Media serialization computer hardware and software to prevent illegal copying and distributing of audio and video by adding an imperceptible electronic watermark to the content thereof that enables the users to track and trace illegal copies to the initial recipient | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Civolution B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VTRACK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 29, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |