Drawing for YONICE

USPTO serial 79042360

YONICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YONICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus

Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; milk beverages with milk as dominant ingredientABANDONED—
030Semi processed food additives for non-nutritional purposes for ice creams and pastries, namely, seasoning pastes, seasoning powders and flavouringsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 5, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 18, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 3, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 3, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 3, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 3, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 11, 2008RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 26, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 25, 2008OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jun 25, 2008OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
May 20, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 13, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 12, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 27, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2007RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Sep 26, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance