Drawing for LIFTS WITH CARE

USPTO serial 79042371

LIFTS WITH CARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3576343Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 17, 2009
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIFTS WITH CARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis K. Ebling

Louis K. Ebling Thompson Hine LLP312 Walnut Street, Suite 1400Cincinnati, OH 45202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Special furniture for medical use, namely, leg support extenders for attachment to furniture, mobile and stationary invalid lifts and patient stretchers, all adapted for medical purposes; walking supports for disabled, namely, crutches, supporting canes, walking framesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Education services, namely, providing training, seminars and practical tests in the field of injury prevention relating to movement of persons and objects in order to prevent back injuriesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 14, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 24, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 18, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 18, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 26, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 26, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 17, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 19, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 27, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 1, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 2, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 2, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance