USPTO serial 79042400
OPROSHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPROSHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony H. Handal, Esq.
ANTHONY HANDAL HANDAL & MOROFSKY LLC501 KINGS HIGHWAY EASTFAIRFIELD, CT 06825UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | gum shields for protecting the mouth from injury | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by O-PRO Limited
- Other trademarks owned by OPRO Limited
- Other trademarks owned by OPRO Limited
- Other trademarks owned by OPRO INTERNATIONAL Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named OPROSHIELD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 17, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 28, 2009 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| May 19, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 28, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |