USPTO serial 79042429
QMEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 3, 2009
- Examiner
- SERVANCE, RENEE L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QMEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SEIKO EPSON KABUSHIKI KAISHA also trading as SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION
JP
Other trademarks owned by SEIKO EPSON KABUSHIKI KAISHA also trading as SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION
Epson Toyocom Kabushiki Kaisha; (Epson Toyocom Corporation)
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Epson Toyocom Kabushiki Kaisha; (Epson Toyocom Corporation)
Epson Toyocom Kabushiki Kaisha; (Epson Toyocom Corporation)
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Epson Toyocom Kabushiki Kaisha; (Epson Toyocom Corporation)
Epson Toyocom Kabushiki Kaisha; (Epson Toyocom Corporation)
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Epson Toyocom Kabushiki Kaisha; (Epson Toyocom Corporation)
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Crystalline synthetic quartz used in piezoelectric devices for optical apparatus and devices, measuring or testing machines and instruments, electric or magnetic meters and testers, telecommunication machines and apparatus and electronic machines and apparatus; synthetic quartz processed in the form of wafers used in piezoelectric devices for optical apparatus and devices, measuring or testing machines and instruments, electric or magnetic meters and testers, telecommunication machines and apparatus and electronic machines and apparatus; crystal sensors and electronic circuit devices using crystal sensors; piezoelectric crystal oscillators; piezoelectric crystal units, namely, tuning fork crystal units, megahertz range crystal units; AT Crystal units and surface acoustic wave resonators; telecommunications machines and apparatus, namely, AT cut crystal resonators; piezoelectric crystal filters; atomic oscillators; optical glass; optical apparatus and instruments, namely, optical devices in the nature of optical filters, optical wave plates, dichroic optical prisms, trichroic optical prisms, polarized beam splitter prisms, p-polarized and s-polarized Converters, and Cross Prisms for liquid crystal display projectors, video projectors, liquid crystal on silicon projectors, light emitting diode projectors and cathode ray tube projectors, optical pickups, namely, read heads for optical drives, optical mirrors, optical frequency metrology plates, optical gratings utilizing a periodic variation of the refractive index on optical glass used in optical pickups for tracking servo systems and spectral analyzer as dispersion elements; optical apparatus and instruments, namely, optical low pass filters, heat sinkplates for liquid crystal display projectors, video projectors, liquid crystal on silicon projectors, light emitting diode projectors and cathode ray tube projectors, and etalon optical filters; Electronic machines and apparatus, namely, oscillators, namely, Temperature Compensated Crystal Oscillator, Voltage Controlled Crystal Oscillator, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator, programmable oscillators, clock oscillators, and atomic oscillators, namely, Rubidium oscillators; Electronic machines and apparatus, namely, crystal units and resonators, namely, tuning fork crystal resonators and AT Cut crystal resonators; Electronic machines and apparatus, namely, Surface Acoustic Wave devices, namely, Surface Acoustic Wave resonators, and Surface Acoustic Wave filters; Electronic machines and apparatus, namely, crystal filters, namely, monolithic crystal resonator filters; Electronic machines and apparatus, namely, electronic components and passive electronic components, namely, synthetic quartz crystals, lumbered quartz crystals, and crystal blanks, crystalline synthetic quartz used in piezoelectric devices for optical apparatus and devices, measuring or testing machines and instruments, piezoelectric oscillators, piezoelectric crystal units and piezoelectric filters; Electronic machines and apparatus, namely, synthetic quartz processed in the form of wafers used in piezoelectric devices for optical apparatus and devices, measuring or testing machines and instruments, piezoelectric oscillators, piezoelectric crystal units and piezoelectric filters | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SEIKO EPSON KABUSHIKI KAISHA also trading as SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Epson Toyocom Kabushiki Kaisha; (Epson Toyocom Corporation)
- Other trademarks owned by Epson Toyocom Kabushiki Kaisha; (Epson Toyocom Corporation)
- Other trademarks owned by Epson Toyocom Kabushiki Kaisha; (Epson Toyocom Corporation)
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named QMEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 12, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 3, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |