Drawing for JULI

USPTO serial 79042432

JULI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JULI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Hooks; shackles; lifting slings; steel tie rods (for docks); railway rescue slings; steel cables; cable joints of metal; colored steel plates; metal steels; cast joints; loading or unloading metal straps; metal lifting slings for loading; metal straps for binding; rope thimbles of metal; steel wire ropes; clamps for steel wire; steel wires; metal chains; chain links; lifting links; metal pipes; metal laddersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
022Belts of synthetic fibers for handling loads; packing belts; non-metal belts for loading and unloading; non-metal slings for loading and unloading; non-metal straps for loading; non-metal rope slings; silk strings; rope ladders; cordsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 6, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 18, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 24, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 23, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 23, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 19, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 28, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 28, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance