Drawing for WALLSTYL

USPTO serial 79042458

WALLSTYL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3543771Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 9, 2008
Examiner
BELZER, LYDIA M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with WALLSTYL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Mango

Thomas J. Mango Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metallic construction materials, namely, decorative moldings; non-metallic rigid pipes for building; [ asphalt, pitch and bitumen asphalt; ] non-metallic transportable constructions; non-metallic monuments made of synthetic foamACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 7, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 25, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 25, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 19, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 2, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 2, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 18, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 9, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 23, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 20, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 13, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 13, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 23, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 22, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 22, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 16, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 25, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance