Drawing for MULTIDIAMETER

USPTO serial 79042466

MULTIDIAMETER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MULTIDIAMETER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Cable and pipe penetration seals, made from rubber or plastic; cable and pipe penetration seals, made from metal; cable and pipe penetration seals, non-metallicSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 8, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 26, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 1, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 26, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 4, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 4, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance