USPTO serial 79042475
HITEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3583503Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 3, 2009
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HITEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick W. Meyers
Frederick W. Meyers Ladas & Parry LLP224 South Michigan AvenueSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | Awnings of textile; awnings; tents not for camping; awnings of synthetic materials; [ tarpaulins for ships; tarpaulins not for ships; ropes for mountaineering; ropes and ropes of artificial materials; ] fibrous gaskets for ships; car towing ropes; packing string; thread, not of metal, for wrapping or binding; packing rope [; chemical fiber net s; tents for mountaineering or camping ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2012 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |