Drawing for IMS

USPTO serial 79042477

IMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3587247Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 10, 2009
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles T.J. Weigell

Charles T.J. Weigell Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.866 United Nations PlazaNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs, namely, software for online teleconferencing, audio and video streaming, online meetings, online presentations, online support, and e-learningSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Development and design of computer programs for data processing; design of computer software; conversion of computer programs and data from physical to electronic media, and consulting services related to conversion of computer programs and data from physical to electronic mediaSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Nov 3, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 3, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 14, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 17, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 16, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 16, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 10, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 10, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 26, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 14, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 12, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2008ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 2, 2008LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 27, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 24, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 22, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance