Drawing for ISCO

USPTO serial 79042485

ISCO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3598596Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 31, 2009
Examiner
SWIFT, GILBERT M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISCO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terence J. Linn

Terence J. Linn Gardner, Linn, Burkhart & Flory, LLP2851 Charlevoix Drive SE, Ste 207Grand Rapids, MI 49546UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations and substances, namely, adjuvants [, antigens, human influenza vaccines and drug delivery agents consisting of compounds that facilitate delivery of a wide range of pharmaceuticals ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 18, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 10, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 13, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 13, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 13, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 2, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 30, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 13, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 11, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 24, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 25, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 12, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 20, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 19, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 19, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 16, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 15, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 15, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance