USPTO serial 79042550
SHOPMAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3485213Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 12, 2008
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHOPMAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells Wells IP Law, LLC299 S. Main St., Suite 1300Salt Lake City, UT 84111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Industrial automation plants, namely, machine for automatic storage, automatic orders assembly and automatic direct delivery to the customer of generic goods, industrial robots, industrial plants for automatic storage, namely, machine operated platforms capable of elevation above ground level and used for storage; plants for the manipulation and moving goods, namely, packaging machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Automatic vending machines, computer software for the supervision and control of vending machine and industrial plants and robot systems used for storage, order assembly and delivery of generic goods, musical sound and video recordings, blank optical and magnetic discs, compact optical discs, namely, blank optical discs | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 27, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |