USPTO serial 79042566
SKM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | GO KARTS, REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR GO KARTS, ACCESSORIES FOR GO KARTS, NAMELY, ADJUSTABLE FOOTRESTS, BRAKE CLEANING KITS, CONVERGENCE DISK KITS AND FITTED COVERS, SPARE PARTS, NAMELY, BODY SHIELDS, FLOOR PLATES, SPINDLES, HUBS, AXLES, BEARING SUPPORTS, SPROCKET SUPPORTS, DISK SUPPORTS, BRAKE SYSTEMS, ENGINE MOUNTS, STEERING COLUMNS, STEERING WHEELS, PEDALS, WHEEL RIMS, SPROCKETS, AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS FOR GO KARTS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | PROFESSIONAL SPORTS CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHOES, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATERS, VESTS, COATS, JACKETS, POLO SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, PANTS, TROUSERS, GO KART SUITS AND HATS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF GO KARTS AND GO KART COMPONENTS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MIQUADRA SRL
- Other trademarks owned by INTREPID KART TECHNOLOGY S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by NOUVELITY NEDERLAND B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SKM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 6, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |