USPTO serial 79042604
THIRSTY SWAGMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3520792Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 21, 2008
- Examiner
- OKEKE, BENJAMIN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with THIRSTY SWAGMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Tourism services, namely, arranging travel tours; arranging and conducting of travel tours; transportation of travellers by bus, air, rail and boat; escorting of travellers, namely, tour escorting; travel reservations, namely, travel and tour tickets reservation service; and travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |