Drawing for EMAG

USPTO serial 79042654

EMAG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMAG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Transmission of sound, image and data signals; telecommunications services, including multimedia telecommunications, telecommunications by computer, telephone, fax and satellite radio; providing information via electronic communications channels, in particular via Internet, extranet and intranet systems; operating an electronic marketplaceSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Planning and arranging of entertainment shows, conferences, congresses, discussion forums and events and competitions in the fields of art, culture and sport; information on events in the field of sports, art and culture and fashion; publication and presentation of images, printed matter and reports; including all the aforesaid services using electronic means of telecommunicationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 28, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 23, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 25, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 10, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 10, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance