USPTO serial 79042707
POLY SD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3554307Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 30, 2008
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POLY SD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-37130 LANGEAIS, FR
F-37130 LANGEAIS, FR
F-37130 LANGEAIS, FR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Component parts of machines intended for the industrial processing of milk or for the industrial manufacture of cheeses, namely, knives for cutting curd, coagulation vat stirrers, grasping tongs, guide track profiles, reinforcing profiles, support profiles, pulleys, guide rollers, conveyor rollers, conveyor chains, all these goods being of composite plastic material suitable for contact with foodstuffs | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Tubs, namely, plastic tubs for manufacturing cheese; moulds, namely, plastic moulds for manufacturing cheese; cheese mould blocks, namely, plastic mould blocks for manufacturing cheese; vats and coagulation microvats, namely, vats and coagulation microvats not of metal; plastic rods for use in draining and ripening whey; moulding or drainage trays, namely, plastic trays for use with cheese moulds to drain cheese in cheese manufacturing; plastic boards and baskets for use in cheese manufacturing to permit ripening and draining of cheese; plastic base supports for supporting cheese during ripening and draining used in the manufacturing of cheese; plastic blades as parts of moulds for cutting curd during cheese production; fish plates, namely, belts placed around cheese in moulds to facilitate their reversal during cheese manufacturing; identification plates not of metal; plastic moulding ladles for use with moulds in cheese manufacturing to mould cheese; plastic scrapers for smoothing surfaces of cheese during cheese manufacturing; plastic cheese sterilization plates for use in cheese manufacturing to maintain sterilization of cheese during ripening; all of these goods being of composite plastic material suitable for contact with foodstuffs, and all for use in the industrial processing of milk and the industrial manufacture of cheese | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 3, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 15, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |