USPTO serial 79042719
ISOLAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3722437Status 706
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 8, 2009
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ISOLAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Trelleborg Sealing Solutions UK Ltd
Tewkesbury, GB
Other trademarks owned by Trelleborg Sealing Solutions UK Ltd
Trelleborg Sealing Solutions UK Ltd
GB
Other trademarks owned by Trelleborg Sealing Solutions UK Ltd
Trelleborg Sealing Solutions UK Ltd
GB
Other trademarks owned by Trelleborg Sealing Solutions UK Ltd
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica S. Sachs
Jessica S. Sachs Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC5445 Corporate DriveSuite 200Troy, MI 48098Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Non-metal seals for use in the chemical, semiconductor, pharmaceutical and hydrocarbon process industries, and sealing products, namely, O-Rings and gaskets for use in the chemical, semiconductor, pharmaceutical, aerospace and hydrocarbon process industries made out of perfluoroelastomers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Trelleborg Sealing Solutions UK Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Trelleborg Sealing Solutions UK Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Trelleborg Sealing Solutions UK Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named ISOLAST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 10, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 1, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |