Drawing for CUTBUS

USPTO serial 79042759

CUTBUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3445572Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 10, 2008
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CUTBUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart J. Bellus

Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic control units and control devices used with cutting tools, namely, cutting torches, laser cutters and water jet cutting tools; data processing equipment, namely, computers; programs for data processing; machine readable data storage media, namely, DVDs, CD-ROMs, diskettes and solid state disks, furnished with data processing programs; electric wires; electric connectorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Design, development and creation of computer software for data processingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 1, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 9, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 27, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 18, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 10, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
May 10, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 10, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 11, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 11, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 11, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 20, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 20, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance