Drawing for SUNLIKE LIGHTING

USPTO serial 79042793

SUNLIKE LIGHTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3673099Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 25, 2009
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUNLIKE LIGHTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD M KRIEGSMAN

EDWARD M KRIEGSMAN KRIEGSMAN & KRIEGSMAN30 TURNPIKE ROADSUITE 9SOUTHBOROUGH, MA 01772

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Lamps for medical purposes, lamps for operating tables, lamps for physiotherapy, lamps with continuous visible light for medical purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Lamps for non-medical purposes, lamps for breeding of animals and plants, lamps for beauty and cosmetic care, lamps for tanning, lamps with continuous visible light for non-medical purposes, lamps comprising a plurality of LEDs for producing daylight; pin socket LED-lamps, LED-board with or without a control and operation apparatus; light bulbs; lighting and lamp fixturesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 26, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 12, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 24, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 1, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 1, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 31, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 9, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 25, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 9, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 20, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 7, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 7, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 20, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 8, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 7, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 7, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2008PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 24, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 20, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 13, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 26, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 9, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 6, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance