Drawing for ERHEL HYDRIS

USPTO serial 79042831

ERHEL HYDRIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3598601Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 31, 2009
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ERHEL HYDRIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Load transportation utility land vehicles and heavy lorries, fitted with lifting tailgates used to raise or lower loads; Lifting devices, namely, lifting tailgates fitted on trucks and used to raise or lower loadsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2018CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 22, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 22, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 15, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 15, 2017CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
May 5, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 21, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 20, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 7, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 6, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 6, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 19, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 30, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 13, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 4, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 4, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 4, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 28, 2008CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Nov 20, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 17, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 3, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 3, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 1, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 15, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 12, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2007SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance